Narrative identity
AI systems increasingly participate in the descriptions through which people become socially and institutionally legible.
My research sits between philosophy of technology, epistemology, ethics, narrative identity, digital rights, and institutional responsibility. It asks what happens when computational systems become part of how people are described, judged, remembered, and governed.
I am not interested in treating AI as a fictional moral person or in reducing ethics to a checklist. The relevant questions concern the institutions that build and deploy systems, the claims those systems are permitted to make, the persons who bear the consequences, and the routes through which error can be challenged and repaired.
AI systems increasingly participate in the descriptions through which people become socially and institutionally legible.
A fluent output should not acquire authority without traceable evidence, uncertainty, and a responsible human or institution.
Responsibility cannot disappear into a chain of providers, models, interfaces, and operators.
Kazan Federal University. Philosophical formation in ethics, social philosophy, epistemology, and philosophy of technology.
Kazan Federal University. Continued research on technology, digital identity, rights, and the social consequences of networked systems.
Applied work with online identity, information harms, privacy, reputation, cybersecurity, and the practical difficulty of locating responsibility across platforms and institutions.
Current work on virtual and narrative identity, machine testimony, responsibility allocation, dignity, contestability, democratic oversight, belonging, and ethics of knowledge.