PLATFORM ACCESSRESEARCH / PROFESSIONAL / INSTITUTIONAL

Do not buy an ethics score. Build a defensible record of judgment.

Access supports private cases, evidence, assessment versions, responsibility maps, and structured reports. Institutional review is scoped separately because consequential systems cannot be responsibly assessed through a subscription form alone.

Researcher

Individual inquiry

€29 / month
  • Private research library
  • Saved public-diagnostic sessions
  • 5 assisted assessments each month
  • Evidence notes and versioned reports
Team

Internal governance function

€690 / month
  • Up to 10 users
  • Shared cases and review workflow
  • Audit trail
  • Branded reports
  • Institutional templates
  • Priority review
Institutional assessment

Independent review of a consequential AI system.

For organisations requiring interviews, evidence review, responsibility architecture, written findings, workshops, and a remediation plan.

Typical scope€5,000–€20,000Defined after system and evidence reviewRequest a scoped proposal
01

No certification theatre

The platform does not certify that a system is “ethical”. It documents arguments, evidence, unresolved risk, and responsibility.

02

Human review remains mandatory

AI-assisted findings are treated as analytical material, not as final legal, moral, or institutional judgment.

03

Private evidence remains private

Case files are separated from the public research archive and governed by account-level access controls.